– AS REFLECTED IN THE OLD TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES – |
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
3. |
|
4. |
|
5. |
|
6. |
| 1. | INTRODUCTION |
|||
The
Old Testament Scriptures present the "Wind of the Lord" as the
principal agent of God's activity in the earth. Although angels do His
bidding, it is His own power that is portrayed as the "Ruach"
of "Yahweh", representing His person and enacting His
will. |
||||
During
the course of Old Testament history, changes in the use of the term "ruach"
do not necessarily indicate a change in thinking on the essential nature
of spirit. The natural development of language idiom in any culture will
tend to produce derived and associated meanings of a significant term.
An example of this is emotions that are described as a spirit (anger,
Job 4:9; despair, Ezek. 3:14; patience, Prov. 17:27), and also non-material
agencies (evil spirits) which sometimes may force such an emotion upon
a person (I Sam. 16:14; I Kgs. 22:22). |
||||
Further,
development in understanding in the Old Testament should be seen as the
expansion of seminal concepts, as well as shifts of emphasis appropriate
to the need of the situation, rather than changes in essential understanding
of the concept from a more-erroneous to a more-correct view, with reference
to the Christian Church's dogma. This is demonstrated in Christ's own
exegesis of the Old Testament Scripture to the Sadducees on bodily resurrection
(Mat. 22:23-33). |
||||
Changes
in thinking in Scripture concerning the Spirit of the Lord seem to have
occurred from two sources. |
||||
| 1.1 General or Natural Development (see Section 3). | ||||
The
real continuity of Israel's religion in the Old Testament period (with
its stress on passing on its historical view of its Faith to the next
generation, Deut. 5:6-7), with its unique linear view of history and the
progressive development of the nation's sacred Scriptures, would tend
to produce a continuous enlargement of understanding in the believing
remnant that carried the nation's spiritual heritage through the generations. |
||||
1.2 Special
or Reactive Development (see Section 4). |
||||
The
occurrence of new politico religious circumstances would undoubtedly bring
a reaction among the faithful to the new threats that challenged the integrity
and special nature of their Faith. Faith's response to these would tend
to produce new depth of comprehension and an enrichment for following
generations via the sacred writings of the faithful core of the covenant
nation. |
||||
Thus
the physical, social, historical, political, etc., path of the nation
toward the "fulness of time" had a dynamic effect upon the growth
of their understanding of the Spirit of Yahweh. |
||||
| 2. | THE NATURE OF SPIRIT | |||
The
primary metaphor of the Spirit of God is Wind. It is a marvelous natural
image for the supernatural concept it carried. The wind that could not
be seen but rolled rocks from before it and swept so fiercely or majestically
with such freedom across the terrible wilderness was the most readily
available and suitable metaphor to describe the active power of the Most
High (Ps. 55:8). To look for some source for Israel in pagan societies
of the time of this use is to miss the point that, not borrowing, but
a common source - nature - significantly molded thinking about the supernatural. |
||||
Although
Michael Green seems intimidated by Moule's skepticism concerning an association
of of the Ruach of Yahweh with creative activity (1985:31), explanations
otherwise appear forced. That the New English Bible chooses to translate
Genesis 1:2 as "a mighty wind blew" does not agree with the
verb ("shake" or "tremble" Jer.23:9; "hovering"
Deut.32:11). It makes attractive thinking, in the light of modern evolutionary
theory and a desire for some agreement from the Genesis account, but it
just does not fit the context. Rather, the unfinished creation ("tohu
ve bohu") waits under the on-site energy of God's power for the
Word to speak light into the first day. Green stresses the link in the
rest of the Old Testament between the Word and the Spirit (1985:23) but
draws back from recognizing it here, the greatest demonstration of God's
power, power which the Spirit directly enacts. |
||||
The
Spirit is more than God's wind of power. The Spirit is also the Breath
of His presence. The development from "wind" to "breath"
is also a very natural semantic step. The wind represented the great Breath
of God (II Sam. 22:16), and the breath of the flesh is its ruach-wind
(Gen. 6:17). The Ruach and Nephesh of Yahweh (Job 34:14)
are often used as synonyms but each has its own special emphasis. His
"breath" conveys life as well as power, as He wills. As breath
is a sign of life among humans so the Spirit is the life of the Almighty
present and imparted (Gen. 2:7). One must be careful however not to read
too much into the use of a metaphor (especially in a poetic context),
for the "blast" from God's "nostrils" is sometimes
just the blowing of a mighty wind (Ex. 15:8-10). |
||||
These
concepts of the power and life of God that the term Ruach came
to convey naturally also implied His presence with His people, the powerful
life-giving presence of their God (Gaybba 1987:17). If the Spirit was
the presence of God then His holiness demanded a moral effect in the persons
upon whom His (holy) Spirit came. Brian Gaybba therefore observes that
"moral and religious renewal was attributed to the Spirit's presence"
(1987:18). Against this background then the idea of the Spirit as a "distinct"
reality (Gaybba 1987:34) developed (Micah 3:8) and led to the late Old
Testament tendency to "personalize the Spirit" (Gaybba 1987:34). |
||||
| 3. | ||||
God's
Spirit is portrayed as given or placed upon or in various persons in the
sense of equipping them for special functions (artistic skill in Bezaleel,
physical strength in Samson), yet with this enabling there is always associated
the sanctifying effect of the Spirit as the presence of God. For instance
Samson is separated by the life-long vow of the Nazirite. Two functions
begin to stand out however that became increasingly significant in the
life of Israel – the prophet and the leader or king (although in Moses
and Samuel these functions largely coincide). |
||||
The
later function of prophet seems to have arisen from the Spirit-related
phenomenon of prophesying rather than Law-related teaching. When Moses
delegates his leadership to elders, God confirms their appointment by
putting the Spirit that was on Moses upon them, and they prophesied together,
all seventy, but not again (Num.10:10). In this incident, in spite of
what Michael Green says (1985:24), there is no sense whatsoever of communicating
a special message to hearers. Hearers seem not to be relevant. This phenomenon,
in amore ordered form, is referred to in the levitical worship of God
before the Temple was built (I Chron.25:1-8) where Spirit-inspired praise
toward God is understood. |
||||
Those
recognized by this speech-enabling of the Spirit of God were the natural
source for prophets to the nation (I Sam. 19:20). They were persons from
whom one could hope to hear the truth revealed and the mind of God communicated.
The early term for prophet, seer, indicates that the phenomenon was by
vision or dream (as was common to many early societies) as well as inspired
utterance. The general use of the term "ecstatic" is not appropriate
here for it presupposes an acquaintance with the psychology of the prophetic
consciousness which is certainly not known. As the function of prophets
in early Israel appears to have been spontaneous and informal so its national
leadership also. As the need arose and in answer to the prayers of the
people, the Spirit of Yahweh "clothed Himself with Gideon" (Jud.6:34) or "broke in upon Samson" (Jud.14:6,19), thus providing
military deliverance and leadership to the people on an ad hoc basis.
Disillusionment with Samuel's administrative system and religious decline
are given as background to the people's demand for a formally recognized
king. This change led to new developments in the nation's experience of
the inspired prophet. |
||||
Formal
central leadership in Israel inaugurated with the kingship of Saul led,
from David's time, to a royal seer or prophet, and later, following the
fashion of foreign kings, to many professional court-prophets. Thus the
association of the Spirit of God with a specific office, which began ritually
in the inaugural anointing of the priests and the cultic furniture and
practically shown by the prophesying of the elders appointed by Moses,
was completed, and continued even in the New Testament's view of a corrupted
office (John 11:49-52). |
||||
| 4. | CAUSES
OF CONCEPTUAL SHIFTS |
|||
The
professionalizing of prophethood under the monarchy led almost unavoidably
to the development of false prophesying as the monarchy began to corrupt
itself and apostatise. The authenticity was now simply the apparently
supernatural element, for they claimed to speak from beyond the natural,
from the Lord. Reaction to the abuse of the prophetic function produced
a significant shift in the concept of the Spirit's activity and nature
among the faithful remnant among whom the Old Testament was written. The
moral element became more importantly the mark of a true prophet, and
the emphasis can be seen in the records of the words of the eighth century
prophets. True prophets were those who addressed the moral apostasy of
the nation. They unavoidably contradicted the court prophets and their
sponsors, and thus Amos' declaration – "I am no prophet, nor a prophet's
son; I am a herdsman, and the Lord took me from following the flock"
(7:14-16). Should not be read as a disclaimer of a certain style (ecstatic)
of prophesying, as Green and Gaybba allege, but as a denial of any professionalism,
in background training or recognized position. He has been specially commissioned
by God to directly address the nation's need. He is no career-prophet!
The new emphasis or tone in the voices of God's prophets were a response
to the changed quality in the prophetic status in Israel. |
||||
Likewise,
the corrupted monarchy called forth not only rebuke but also stimulating
promises of a spiritually restored kingship - a new David to lead Israel
under the Spirit's anointing again – the Messiah. A renewed covenant,
not of the hypocritically enacted letter of the Law, but of the heart. |
||||
Thus,
the special developments in Israel's understanding of the Spirit of Yahweh
were greatly contributed to by the corrupting forces inside the national
cult and the vigorous reaction of the faithful remnant among whom the
true prophets were spokesmen of the divine mind. From the beginning of
the Law a prophet's integrity lay in his or her conformity to its teaching
(Deut. 13:1-5) and as the canon of holy Scripture grew in volume the significance
of this harmony of the new prophecy with the old accepted Word became
all the more important. |
||||
There
is no parallel among the prophets for our present day expository preaching
and we should not try to see them as sermonizers in any modern sense.
They were spokesmen and women of the Spirit of God, speaking from beyond
the natural, whose authenticity could be tested by their conformity to
the Word written, that which the Spirit had spoken previously, but not
limited to its previous declarations. |
||||
Royal
betrayal of the nation's covenant and the heart-breaking course that the
nation was plunged into, in the midst of prophetic corrections and warnings,
also triggered the increased growth of the Messianic hope. Salvation was
in the future. The Spirit of Yahweh would anoint the great Servant of
Yahweh with wisdom to enact justice. The Spirit would be poured out upon
Israel in its renewal, a renewal with a new covenant written in the heart. |
||||
| 5. | CONCLUSION |
|||
The
development in understanding of the Spirit of God in the Old Testament
Scriptures is undoubtedly the product of Israel's painful but God-directed
history. The sacred canon closes with anticipation unfulfilled. From an
understanding of the Spirit simply as God's active power, the awareness
of the believing community has grown to apprehend the energizing life,
awesome presence, sanctifying nature and hints of personhood of the great
Spirit of the Lord. |
||||
This anticipation has its ultimate expectation in the person and reign of the Spirit anointed and directed king, Israel's Messiah. |
||||
| "So they shall fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun; for He will come like a rushing stream, which the Wind [Spirit] of the LORD drives. 'And a Redeemer will come to Zion, to those in Jacob who turn from transgression', declares the LORD." |
Isaiah 59:19-20. | |||
| Yet, | without the New Testament's rich complement of its fulfillment in Jesus the Christ, the forward
look of the significance of the Spirit's actions through the prophets
would be no more than a process of idealization among a Qumran-type retreating
remnant that waited for the never-never of tomorrow.
|
|||
| See also: |
|
|||
| Bibliography: | ||||
| Gaybba, Brian 1987
The Spirit of Love, London: Geoffrey Chapman. Green, Michael 1985 I Believe in the Holy Spirit, London: Hodder & Stoughton. Payne, J.Barton 1962 The Theology of the Older Testament, Grand Rapids, USA: Zondervan Publishing House. Robinson, H.Wheeler 1962 The Christian Experience of the Holy Spirit, Glasgow, UK: Fontana Books, Collins. |
||||
| Copyright © Lloyd Thomas 1997-2010. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Feel free to copy as long as this full copyright notice is included. FOR A ROUGH TRANSLATION SIMPLY CHOOSE A LANGUAGE |