The Thomas Pages homepage
The Kingdom of God
Summary:  The Kingdom of God is not Heaven.
The Kingdom of God is not the Church.
The Kingdom of God is not good-overcoming-evil.
The Kingdom of God is not Jesus Christ because of His deity/incarnation.
The Kingdom of God is not a future Israel ruling the world under a messianic king.
The Kingdom of God is not a territory or sphere within which the rule/reign/authority of God is recognised.
 
*This is the first resurrection through which the righteous of all ages will enter the fellowship of the Kingdom with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Matt.8:11).
The Kingdom of God is the immediate authority/rule/reign of God present – in one of only two forms:
  1. 
the visible,
    
– which will yet appear in the glorious return of the Lord Jesus Christ* (hallelujah!);
2. 
the invisible,
    
– which was directly present in the sinless Jesus through the special relationship of the Spirit of God to Him from when He thereby became the Christ after His baptism by John,
which same relationship to the Spirit since Pentecost continues in principle in Christ's people today.

"Anyone who does NOT have the Spirit of Christ does NOT belong to Him." (Romans 8:9).
CONTENTS
1.
Introduction   
5.
The Kingdom Ethic
2.
The Kingdom in Time   
6.
The God of the Kingdom
3.
The Mystery of the Kingdom   
7.
The Entrance
4.
The Need of the Kingdom   
8.
The Continuance
 
1. INTRODUCTION  
The
Kingdom of God, or 'basileia tou theou,' of the New Testament was the sum and central theme of the preaching of Jesus Christ (Mark 1:15), yet strangely Jesus never once defined what He meant by it. This term and the concept it carries should therefore be understood in the light of Christ's presupposition to His own ministry; namely, Israel's faith and its history.
 
 
Although this expression itself is not found in the record of Israel's faith, our Old Testament, the idea of God's kingship over His whole creation is well known in these Scriptures (e.g. Psalm 103:19). But even more, it is the special kingship of God over the Israel nation, in His covenant relationship, that is the proper origin of this concept ("King of Jacob" Isaiah 41:21, and Judges 8:23).
 
The
standard phrase of the Rabbis, 'Malkuth Shamaim' (Kingdom of Heaven), which is echoed in Matthew's gospel, is simply a reverent semitic circumlocution to avoid the word "God", and NOT a different kingdom concept. However, among the post-Second Temple Jews this expression became degraded to often mean no more than submission to the Torah (Mosaic Law) and technically even to the reciting of their 'Shema' proclamation of faith (Gamaliel II, 110 AD). Yet, the rabbinical literature, and 4 Esdras in particular, strongly anticipate the coming of an "Anointed One" to introduce this divine Kingdom and establish it on earth.
 
The
basic idea then of this 'basileia' is the desired rule or reign of God as king, which Jesus aptly expressed in the prayer:
"Thy Kingdom come – Thy will be done on earth as it is done in Heaven."

Matthew 6:10
2. THE KINGDOM IN TIME  
The
end-time aspect of the Kingdom ("Thy Kingdom come") is based in the Old Testament prophets' idea of the "Day of the Lord" (as in Joel, Amos, Zephaniah, etc.). This is the establishment of the anticipated Kingdom as the climax of all history. This prophetic message of the coming Kingdom was, however, always purposefully ethical in its application. This end-time hope arose from faith in God's eventual righteous judgment on history and the faithfulness of His covenant mercy applied to the people who bore His name (Daniel 9:19).
 
 
This Kingdom was not understood as competing among the kingdoms of the world. This Kingdom would be received by God's people as an award directly from God and not in any way produced by effort of it's citizenry (Daniel 7:27). God, as Judge, would break-in to human history – "to make an end to sin" and to "bring in everlasting righteousness" in Israel (Daniel 9:24).
 
 
Thus the tension between these two ideas: the ethical concept of the Kingdom character in the present and its future historical establishment, provided the range of differences in the Christian church's recent confused understanding of the Kingdom.
 
 
Some Views
 
 
The former (the ethical) was stressed to the exclusion of the latter (the end-time) in the so-called liberal theological school of thought, as found in Ritchl, Harnack, Holtzmann, and Wellhausen. And so, the Kingdom became little more than an ethical community.
 
 
Against this, Johannes Weiss, and later Albert Schweitzer counter posed an end-time Kingdom as being the full picture of Christ's proclamation of the Kingdom. To Schweitzer Jesus was simply an ardent apocalyptist whose attempted precipitation of the Kingdom backfired on Him. He understood Christ's words of "My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?" as a dying cry of disillusionment that His sacrifice had not triggered a reaction from God to introduce the end-time Kingdom. Rudolph Bultmann's explanation however, leaves Jesus in an undiscoverable past with His kingdom message as simply a challenge to come to a decision in favour of God, and the Kingdom is merely an existential ideal. CH Dodd's so-called 'realized eschatology', which so influenced Robinson, is simply a swing back to the old liberal view where the apocalyptic language of Jesus is considered as romantic additions by the early church.
 
 
Herman Ridderbos well remarks that Schweitzer –
"clearly shows how much of the whole history of exegesis has been determined, not by historical objectivity but rather by subjective theological prejudice" (1962:xv).
 
 
Post-enlightenment Albrecht Ritchl's liberal conception was repudiated by Weiss as being more Kantian than biblical. Karl Barth on the other hand promoted a "supra-historical eschatology" in his Romerbrief, appealing that – "the New Testament end is not a temporal event, not a fabulous down-fall of the world; it is entirely without any relation to any historical, terrestrial, or cosmic catastrophe" (Ridderbos 1962:xxii).
 
 
Hendrikus Berkhof attacks Dodd for this same idea of "timeless fact", "eternal order" and declares it "almost Platonic" (1966:67). Yet Ridderbos in turn opposes Weiss by declaring – "what Jesus meant by the coming of the Kingdom, or what He cannot have meant by it, can certainly not be answered from the apocalyptic sector of the late Jewish expectation of the future, as is done by Weiss and his followers" and continues significantly, that – "the answer is only possible in the light of the synoptic 'kerygma' itself, with a continuous consultation of the references to the Old Testament" (1962:67).

See:
The Darby Deception
3. THE MYSTERY OF THE KINGDOM  
Jesus
made the statement that from John the Baptist's time, as the great watershed period, and still continuing at that time 
"the Kingdom of Heaven has been coming violently" (Matt.11:11-13)
or radically, as some translate, to indicate the uniqueness of His ministry (see also Luke 16:16), a mission that had begun under John with Christ's baptism (Acts 1:22). Jesus' was NOT just another prophet pronouncing on the coming Kingdom – He was the essence of the Kingdom itself! His disciples, the 'biastai' – the violent – the radical, were seizing hold of the Kingdom. In other words, entrance into the Kingdom was not a passive acceptance of history's goal but a radical response to follow Jesus Himself (Luke 14:26).
 
 
That Jesus saw the Kingdom as uniquely existing in Himself (the only person ever who did the Father's will on earth as it is done in Heaven) is shown clearly in the transfiguration record in all three synoptic gospels. All three carry the statement that, of the crowd hearing Jesus, some would not die before they saw the Kingdom of God, and immediately follow with the description of His glorious physical transfiguration before Peter, James and John, with Moses and Elijah's witness to Him  (Lk.9:27-31; Mk.9:1-5; Mat.16:28-17:3). That the kingdom could be directly present in Jesus yet not be visible to the crowds that milled around Him, was its mystery form. Christ revealed was the epitomé of the Kingdom, the appearance of which will be physically revealed at His return.
 
 
The Kingdom Parables
 
 
Herein lay the "mystery" of the Kingdom of Heaven, as Christ described it. His disciples could receive this mystery for they had received Him, but to "those outside" the message was deliberately hidden in parables (Mk.4:11,12).
 
 
This "mystery" is first described as the Sower sowing the "word of the Kingdom" in the hearts of the hearers (Mat.13:19). The provisional nature of the Kingdom's coming in Jesus is shown. The coming of the Kingdom is the way of the "seed". Its consummation or harvest is still FUTURE, yet the Kingdom, as a seed, HAS come.
 
 
Next, the parable of Wheat and Weeds further develops the relation between the coming of Jesus and the 'eschatos', the End. It teaches that the judgment (the "day of the Lord"), as prophesied by John the Baptist, necessarily waits until a future "close of the age" (Mat.13:40). The "favourable year of the Lord" had come, but not the "day of vengeance of our God" (Isaiah 61:1-2 & Luke 4:19). The Son of Man is thus first the Sower before He becomes the Reaper. For this reason the harvest of judgment is not yet.
 
 
The parables of the Mustard Seed and the Leaven (or Yeast) form a complementary couplet, as the Sower and Weeds parables. They show the apparent insignificance of the Kingdom-presence in Christ when compared to its future fulfillment. The first parable expresses it extensively (the birds lodged), the second intensively (every part of the flour).
 
 
Again, the parables of Hidden Treasure and Costly Pearl form a couplet. Both emphasize the radical decision that is necessary for the Kingdom. If it cost all, it is but little! The shock words of Jesus, "except you hate...", amplify this as the 'biazetai' or radical nature of the Kingdom's coming.
 
 
The Fish Net explains the strange mixture of people among the company of Jesus' followers, which was only to be judged in the end-time consummation. The tale of a crop's Spontaneous Growth also connects inseparably the coming of Jesus to the final consummation. Both seed-time and harvest are God's work!

 
4. THE NEED OF THE KINGDOM  
During
the work of Jesus a continuing conflict is evident. From Christ's Temptation to His Crucifixion the "ruler of this world is judged "(John 16:11). Christ's casting out of demons was thus the effect and therefore evidence of the Kingdom's presence (Mat.12:28; Luke 11:20). Satan's activity in this world made the Kingdom a necessity.
 
 
In addition to this spiritual conflict, is humanity's preoccupation with possessions (Mat.16:26; Lk.12:15-21), and also the structural hostility of this world to God's personal rule among us where the "worries of the world" threaten to choke the "word of the Kingdom" (Mat.13:19,22).

See: The Antichrist
5. THE KINGDOM ETHIC  
The
nature of this Kingdom is an ethic described as a "new commandment". It is essentially that the heirs of the Kingdom (Lk.12:32) are to –
"love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another" (Jn.13:34).
This is to be the identifying characteristic of the Kingdom heirs (John 13:35), and of their life-style (John 14:15,21,28,31; 15:9,10,12,17), for which reason God's own love is poured out into the heirs of this Kingdom–
"God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us"
Romans 5:5.
 
This ethic does not exist in copying the ideal. This ethic is the practice of the new nature thus received through being born of the Spirit.
 
Yet
strangely, to Schweitzer this was an abnormal 'interim ethic' – especially in loving one's enemies as expounded in Christ's Sermon on the Mount (Ladd 1974:122). Hans Windisch attempted to find two degrees of ethic: the so-called permanent 'wisdom ethic' and the temporary 'eschatological ethic', and the ethic itself as the qualification for entrance to the Kingdom. This latter idea is in harmony with  the views of  Weiss, Schweitzer, Petersen, and Wilder. Yet, this view is completely excluded by the unmerited grace expressed in Christ's prayer-parable of the Pharisee and Sinner!

 
6. THE GOD OF THE KINGDOM  
Christ's
call to His disciples was to be "perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Matt.5:48). God is not the far off unapproachable One. He is as committed to His own as a father to his children (Mat.5:45), and thus expects them to share in His own nature, His moral nature, His love!
 
 
Christ's coming to humanity is really God's coming (Jn.13:20). He is the seeking God as for a lost 'sheep', a lost 'coin', or a 'prodigal son', and has joy in the finding –
"joy in Heaven over one sinner that repents"
He therefore invites as a rich man, a king, a bridegroom, to come and enjoy His beneficence. Yet He is also a judging God who divides humanity by their response to the person of Jesus ("a sword", Matt.10: 32-40).

Luke 15:7.
7. THE ENTRANCE  
Christ
Jesus is the entrance to God's Kingdom and to the salvation that it offers in the "age to come" (Mk.10:23-30). Therefore, Jesus has authority to forgive sin (Mk.2:10), so that God's righteousness may be given as a gift to those who seek it (Matt.5:6;6:33; Lk.11:9-13). The church, in its message, carries the keys of entrance to the Kingdom of God (Matt.16:19), yet more than this.
 
 
This coming salvation of the new age to come will then include the whole person in God's resurrection glory (Luke 20:35,36; Matthew 25: 34,46).

 
8. THE CONTINUANCE  
The
mystery of this Kingdom continues in the church as it was in Jesus, for as He lived by the Father so His own live by Him (Jn.6:57). This "seed" form of the Kingdom therefore did not consist in Christ's deity but in His practical human relationship to God which began from His baptism.
 
 
The essence of this was His unique relationship to the Holy Spirit which was portrayed in the Spirit's descent upon Him in the sign of a dove; Noah's new beginning. This unique human relationship of His to the Holy Spirit was what Jesus gave to His people on the day of Pentecost. It was this which constituted them as a spiritual body, His Body, to be Christ in the world.
 
 
There is no higher authority within the Christian Church than the Spirit of God by whom this Kingdom is present in the Church. Therefore, the Bible says to all Christians concerning leaders who mislead –
"I write these things to you about those who are trying to deceive you. But the Anointing that you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you [as an ultimate authority]. But as His Anointing [of the Spirit] teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie -- just as it has taught you, abide in Him."
1 John 2:26-27.
Therefore, as He was in the world so are His own in the world,  
 
•   with authority to forgive (Jn.20:23);
•   to continue His works (Jn.14:12); and,
•   enjoy direct access to the Father (Jn.16:26,27);
 
  because of Him ("in My name"), so that they are truly His Body in this world (I Cor.12:27).  
 
This Kingdom mystery, already foreseen in Christ's words to the embryo-church concerning the discipline of reconciliation (Mat.18:15-20) became a new spiritual organism in the earth (Eph. 3:4-6,9-10). For this reason Jesus said –
"there I am in their midst" (Matt.18:20).
 
 
By virtue of which their spiritual fellowship in Him constitutes the divine authority on earth relative to humanity's salvation (Matt.18:18). There is no greater role!
 
 
However, in no way can this be construed as simply referring to the visible fellowship or organization of the believers, in any congregation or denomination. It is the new spiritual identity given them through being personally –
“in Him”
“in Christ”
“in the Beloved”
and thus as His Body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all (Eph.1:3,6,23), as they await the final consummation in His visible coming as King of the Kingdom (Rev.22:20).

 
See also:
Chronology of Confusion
 back
 
  BIBLIOGRAPHY  
 
Barclay, William 1962 Jesus as they saw Him. Amsterdam: SCM Press.
Berkhof, Hendrikus 1966 Christ the Meaning of History. London: SCM Press.
Bright, John 1953 The Kingdom of God. Nashville, USA: Abingdon Press.
Dodd, CH 1971 The Founder of Christianity. London: Collins.
Ladd, GE 1974 A Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, USA: Eerdmans.
Richardson, Alan 1969 A Dictionary of Christian Theology. London: SCM Press.
Ridderbos, Herman 1962 The Coming of the Kingdom. Philadelphia, USA: Presbyterian and Reformed.
Robinson, H. Wheeler 1964 The History of Israel. London: Duckworth
Tenney, Merril C. 1963 Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary. Grand rapids, USA: Zondervan.

 

© Lloyd Thomas 1997-2011. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Feel free to copy, provided this full copyright notice is included.

FOR A ROUGH TRANSLATION SIMPLY CHOOSE A LANGUAGE