| The Kingdom of God |
| Summary: | The Kingdom of God is not Heaven. The Kingdom of God is not the Church. The Kingdom of God is not good-overcoming-evil. The Kingdom of God is not Jesus Christ because of His deity/incarnation. The Kingdom of God is not a future Israel ruling the world under a messianic king. The Kingdom of God is not a territory or sphere within which the rule/reign/authority of God is recognised. |
|
|||||
| The Kingdom of God is the immediate authority/rule/reign of God present – in one of only two forms: | |||||
| 1. | the visible, |
||||
– which will yet appear in the glorious return of the Lord Jesus Christ* (hallelujah!); |
|||||
| 2. | the invisible, |
||||
– which was directly present in the sinless Jesus through the special relationship of the Spirit of God to Him from when He thereby became the Christ after His baptism by John, |
|||||
which same relationship to the Spirit since Pentecost continues in principle in Christ's people today. |
|||||
|
CONTENTS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. | INTRODUCTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The | Kingdom of God,
or 'basileia
tou theou,' of the New Testament was the sum and central theme
of the preaching of Jesus Christ (Mark 1:15), yet strangely Jesus never
once defined what He meant by it. This term and the concept it carries
should therefore be understood in the light of Christ's presupposition
to His own ministry; namely, Israel's faith and its history.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although this expression
itself is not found in the record of Israel's faith, our Old Testament,
the idea of God's kingship over His whole creation is well known in these
Scriptures (e.g. Psalm 103:19). But even more, it is the special kingship
of God over the Israel nation, in His covenant relationship, that
is the proper origin of this concept ("King of Jacob"
Isaiah 41:21, and Judges 8:23). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The | standard phrase
of the Rabbis, 'Malkuth Shamaim' (Kingdom of Heaven), which is
echoed in Matthew's gospel, is simply a reverent semitic circumlocution
to avoid the word "God", and NOT a different kingdom concept. However,
among the post-Second Temple Jews this expression became degraded to often
mean no more than submission to the Torah (Mosaic Law) and technically
even to the reciting of their 'Shema' proclamation of faith (Gamaliel
II, 110 AD). Yet, the rabbinical literature, and 4 Esdras in particular,
strongly anticipate the coming of an "Anointed One" to introduce this
divine Kingdom and establish it on earth. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The | basic idea then
of this 'basileia' is the desired rule or reign of God as king,
which Jesus aptly expressed in the prayer:
"Thy
Kingdom come – Thy will be done on earth as it is done in Heaven."
|
Matthew 6:10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | THE KINGDOM IN TIME | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The | end-time aspect
of the Kingdom ("Thy Kingdom come")
is based in the Old Testament prophets' idea of the "Day of the Lord"
(as in Joel, Amos, Zephaniah, etc.). This is the establishment of the
anticipated Kingdom as the climax of all history. This prophetic message
of the coming Kingdom was, however, always purposefully ethical
in its application. This end-time hope arose from faith in God's eventual
righteous judgment on history and the faithfulness of His
covenant mercy applied to the people who bore His name (Daniel 9:19). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Kingdom was
not understood as competing among the kingdoms of the world. This Kingdom
would be received by God's people as an award directly from God and not
in any way produced by effort of it's citizenry (Daniel 7:27). God, as
Judge, would break-in to human history – "to
make an end to sin" and to "bring in everlasting righteousness" in
Israel (Daniel 9:24).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thus the tension between
these two ideas: the ethical concept of the Kingdom character in the present
and its future historical establishment, provided the
range of differences in the Christian church's recent confused understanding of
the Kingdom. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Some Views |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The former (the ethical)
was stressed to the exclusion of the latter (the end-time) in the so-called
liberal theological school of thought, as found in Ritchl, Harnack, Holtzmann,
and Wellhausen. And so, the Kingdom became little more than an ethical
community. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Against this, Johannes
Weiss, and later Albert Schweitzer counter posed an end-time Kingdom as
being the full picture of Christ's proclamation of the Kingdom. To Schweitzer
Jesus was simply an ardent apocalyptist whose attempted precipitation
of the Kingdom backfired on Him. He understood Christ's words of "My
God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?"
as a dying cry of disillusionment that His sacrifice had not triggered
a reaction from God to introduce the end-time Kingdom. Rudolph Bultmann's
explanation however, leaves Jesus in an undiscoverable past with His kingdom
message as simply a challenge to come to a decision in favour of God,
and the Kingdom is merely an existential ideal. CH Dodd's so-called 'realized
eschatology', which so influenced Robinson, is simply a swing back to
the old liberal view where the apocalyptic language of Jesus is considered
as romantic additions by the early church.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Herman Ridderbos well remarks that Schweitzer –
"clearly shows how much of
the whole history of exegesis has been determined, not by historical objectivity
but rather by subjective theological prejudice" (1962:xv). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post-enlightenment Albrecht
Ritchl's liberal conception was repudiated by Weiss as being more Kantian
than biblical. Karl Barth on the other hand promoted a "supra-historical
eschatology" in his Romerbrief, appealing that – "the New Testament
end is not a temporal event, not a fabulous down-fall of the world; it
is entirely without any relation to any historical, terrestrial, or cosmic
catastrophe" (Ridderbos 1962:xxii). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hendrikus Berkhof attacks
Dodd for this same idea of "timeless fact", "eternal order"
and declares it "almost Platonic" (1966:67). Yet Ridderbos in
turn opposes Weiss by declaring – "what Jesus meant by the coming
of the Kingdom, or what He cannot have meant by it, can certainly not
be answered from the apocalyptic sector of the late Jewish expectation
of the future, as is done by Weiss and his followers" and continues
significantly, that – "the answer is only possible in the light of
the synoptic 'kerygma' itself, with a continuous consultation of
the references to the Old Testament" (1962:67).
|
See:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | THE MYSTERY OF THE KINGDOM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jesus | made the statement that from John the Baptist's time, as the great watershed period, and still continuing at that time
"the Kingdom of Heaven has been coming violently" (Matt.11:11-13)
or radically, as some translate, to indicate the uniqueness of His ministry (see
also Luke 16:16), a mission that had begun under John with Christ's baptism (Acts 1:22). Jesus' was NOT just another prophet pronouncing on the coming Kingdom – He was the essence of the Kingdom itself! His disciples, the 'biastai' – the violent – the radical, were seizing hold of the Kingdom. In other words, entrance into the Kingdom was not a passive acceptance of history's goal but a radical response to follow Jesus Himself (Luke 14:26). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That Jesus saw the Kingdom
as uniquely existing in Himself (the only person ever who did the Father's
will on earth as it is done in Heaven) is shown clearly in the transfiguration
record in all three synoptic gospels. All three carry the statement that,
of the crowd hearing Jesus, some would not die before they saw the Kingdom
of God, and immediately follow with the description of His glorious physical
transfiguration before Peter, James and John, with Moses and Elijah's
witness to Him (Lk.9:27-31; Mk.9:1-5; Mat.16:28-17:3). That the kingdom could be directly present in Jesus yet not be visible to the crowds that milled around Him, was its mystery form. Christ revealed
was the epitomé of the Kingdom, the appearance of which will be physically revealed at His return. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Kingdom Parables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Herein lay the "mystery" of the Kingdom of Heaven, as Christ described it. His disciples could receive this mystery for they had received Him, but to "those outside" the message was deliberately hidden in parables (Mk.4:11,12). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This "mystery" is first described as the Sower sowing the "word of the Kingdom" in the hearts of the hearers (Mat.13:19). The provisional nature of the Kingdom's coming in Jesus is shown. The coming of the Kingdom is the way of the "seed". Its consummation or harvest is still FUTURE, yet the Kingdom, as a seed, HAS come.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Next, the parable of Wheat and Weeds further develops the relation between the coming of Jesus and the 'eschatos', the End. It teaches that the judgment (the "day of the Lord"), as prophesied by John the Baptist, necessarily waits until a future "close of the age" (Mat.13:40). The "favourable year of the Lord" had come, but not the "day of vengeance of our God" (Isaiah 61:1-2 & Luke 4:19). The Son of Man is thus first the Sower before He becomes the Reaper. For this reason the harvest of judgment is not yet.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The parables of the
Mustard Seed and the Leaven (or Yeast) form a complementary couplet, as
the Sower and Weeds parables. They show the apparent insignificance of
the Kingdom-presence in Christ when compared to its future fulfillment.
The first parable expresses it extensively (the birds lodged), the second
intensively (every part of the flour). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Again, the parables
of Hidden Treasure and Costly Pearl form a couplet. Both emphasize the
radical decision that is necessary for the Kingdom. If it cost all, it
is but little! The shock words of Jesus, "except
you hate...", amplify this as the 'biazetai' or radical nature of the Kingdom's coming.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Fish Net explains
the strange mixture of people among the company of Jesus' followers, which
was only to be judged in the end-time consummation. The tale of a crop's
Spontaneous Growth also connects inseparably the coming of Jesus to the
final consummation. Both seed-time and harvest are God's work!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. | THE NEED OF THE KINGDOM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| During | the work of Jesus
a continuing conflict is evident. From Christ's Temptation to His Crucifixion
the "ruler of this world is judged "(John 16:11). Christ's casting out of demons was thus the effect and therefore
evidence of the Kingdom's presence (Mat.12:28; Luke 11:20). Satan's activity
in this world made the Kingdom a necessity. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In addition to this
spiritual conflict, is humanity's preoccupation with possessions (Mat.16:26;
Lk.12:15-21), and also the structural hostility of this world to God's
personal rule among us where the "worries
of the world" threaten to choke
the "word of the Kingdom"
(Mat.13:19,22).
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. | THE KINGDOM ETHIC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The | nature of this Kingdom is an ethic described as a "new commandment". It is essentially that the heirs of the Kingdom (Lk.12:32) are to –
"love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another" (Jn.13:34).
This is to be the identifying characteristic of the Kingdom heirs (John 13:35), and of their life-style (John 14:15,21,28,31; 15:9,10,12,17), for which reason God's own love is poured out into the heirs of this Kingdom–
|
Romans 5:5. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This ethic does not exist in copying the ideal. This ethic is the practice of the new nature thus received through being born of the Spirit. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yet | strangely, to Schweitzer
this was an abnormal 'interim ethic' – especially in loving one's enemies
as expounded in Christ's Sermon on the Mount (Ladd 1974:122). Hans Windisch
attempted to find two degrees of ethic: the so-called permanent 'wisdom
ethic' and the temporary 'eschatological ethic', and the ethic itself
as the qualification for entrance to the Kingdom. This latter idea is
in harmony with the views of Weiss, Schweitzer, Petersen,
and Wilder. Yet, this view is completely excluded by the unmerited grace
expressed in Christ's prayer-parable of the Pharisee and Sinner!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. | THE GOD OF THE KINGDOM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Christ's | call to His disciples was to be "perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Matt.5:48). God is not the far off unapproachable One. He is as committed to His own as a father to his children (Mat.5:45), and thus expects them to share in His own nature, His moral nature, His love!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christ's coming to humanity is really God's coming (Jn.13:20). He is the seeking God as for a lost 'sheep', a lost 'coin', or a 'prodigal son', and has joy in the finding –
"joy in Heaven over one sinner that repents"
He therefore invites as a rich man, a king, a bridegroom, to come and enjoy His beneficence. Yet He is also a judging God who divides humanity by their response to the person of Jesus ("a sword", Matt.10: 32-40).
|
Luke 15:7. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7. | THE ENTRANCE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Christ | Jesus is the entrance to God's Kingdom and to the salvation that it offers in the "age to come" (Mk.10:23-30). Therefore, Jesus has authority to forgive sin (Mk.2:10), so that God's righteousness may be given as a gift to those who seek it (Matt.5:6;6:33; Lk.11:9-13). The church, in its message, carries the keys of entrance to the Kingdom of God (Matt.16:19), yet more than this. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This coming salvation
of the new age to come will then include the whole person in God's resurrection
glory (Luke 20:35,36; Matthew 25: 34,46).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8. | THE CONTINUANCE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The | mystery of this
Kingdom continues in the church as it was in Jesus, for as He lived by
the Father so His own live by Him (Jn.6:57). This "seed"
form of the Kingdom therefore did not consist in Christ's deity but in
His practical human relationship to God which began from His baptism.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The essence of this was His unique relationship
to the Holy Spirit which was portrayed in the Spirit's descent upon Him
in the sign of a dove; Noah's new beginning. This unique human relationship
of His to the Holy Spirit was what Jesus gave to His people on the day
of Pentecost. It was this which constituted them as a spiritual body,
His Body, to be Christ in the world. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is no higher authority within the Christian Church than the Spirit of God by whom this Kingdom is present in the Church. Therefore, the Bible says to all Christians concerning leaders who mislead –
|
1 John 2:26-27. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Therefore, | as He was in the world so are His own in the world, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| because of Him ("in My name"), so that they are truly His Body in this world |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Kingdom mystery, already
foreseen in Christ's words to the embryo-church concerning the discipline
of reconciliation (Mat.18:15-20) became a new spiritual organism in the
earth (Eph. 3:4-6,9-10). For this reason Jesus said –
"there
I am in their midst" (Matt.18:20).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By virtue of which their spiritual fellowship in Him constitutes the divine authority on earth relative to humanity's salvation (Matt.18:18). There is no greater role! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
However, in no way can this
be construed as simply referring to the visible fellowship or organization
of the believers, in any congregation or denomination. It is the new spiritual
identity given them through being personally –
and thus as His Body, the “fullness
of Him who fills all in all” (Eph.1:3,6,23), as they await the final consummation in His visible coming as King of the Kingdom (Rev.22:20).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| See also: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|